Law or the employment contract.
When the amount of remuneration agreed between the parties is clearly and unquestionably unfair, i.e. clearly inconsistent with the basis on which the employment relationship is based cf. Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Katowice of May , , ref. no. act III AUa ; The essence of fairness justice of remuneration is the equivalence of remuneration and work. This is not about equivalence consisting in full equivalent of remuneration and work. Fair remuneration is remuneration equivalent to the quantity and quality of work performed, the type.The right to remuneration for work performed For the time when work is not performed, the employee retains the right to remuneration only if the provisions of labor law provide so cf. art. of the Labor Code . One phone number list of the basic obligations of an employee is to perform work conscientiously and carefully, which is regulated in detail in Art. § of the Labor Code, according to which the Employee is obliged to perform work conscientiously and carefully and to follow the orders of his superiors regarding work.
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/fe6211_2d51b576c1c84a40b0091b3822b0d6c5~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_656,h_376,al_c,lg_1,q_80,enc_auto/fe6211_2d51b576c1c84a40b0091b3822b0d6c5~mv2.jpg
Unless they are inconsistent with the provisions of IMPORTANT - simply remaining in an employment relationship is not the basis for an employee to receive remuneration, because it violates his or her basic obligation under the Code. The case law rightly points out that: Remuneration is due for work performed. For the period of not performing work, the employee retains the right to remuneration only if the provisions of labor law provide so Article of the Labor Code.
頁:
[1]